A comparison
Lithium-ion battery pack and Croissant
Two figures compared the only honest way: calculated together, so that what they have in common moves them together, and read as how many times larger one is than the other, with a range.
Is something on this page wrong? Report it →
Side by side, per kilogram
Scenario Economic-embedded, using FIGARO 2023. Each figure is the middle result of 2,000 runs of the calculation, with the range that holds nine in ten of them beside it, and the grade that range earns.
Lithium-ion battery pack
6.9 × 10⁻⁸ per kilogram(0.36–1.4 × 10⁻⁷)LOWS-MAX · run 2259 · methodology v1.0 · data dv-20261007-44r
One item is one kilogram of assembled lithium-ion battery pack.
Croissant
0.34–1.9 × 10⁻⁷ per kilogramINDICATIVES-MAX · run 2259 · methodology v1.0 · data dv-20261007-44r
One item is one butter croissant as made — 123 g of dough — with its 3 g of packaging.
Which is larger
The model cannot tell whether Lithium-ion battery pack carries more harm than Croissant per kilogram: the range includes both possibilities.
Lithium-ion battery pack against Croissant, per kilogram: ×0.85 as much, and very probably (nine times in ten) between ×0.32–×2.5.
In 100% of the runs calculated together, Lithium-ion battery pack comes out above Croissant.
Calculated together: the same records of harm, the same split of each industry and the same world production in every run, and each product’s own list of materials. Seeing whether two separate ranges overlap would prove nothing either way.
The reason they differ
Deaths per kilogram of each product, by what carries them, with the largest difference first.
By raw material
| Material | Lithium-ion battery pack | Croissant | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milk | 0 | 7.5 × 10⁻⁸ | −7.5 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Cobalt | 4.3 × 10⁻⁸ | 0 | +4.3 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Copper | 1.4 × 10⁻⁸ | 0 | +1.4 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Wheat | 0 | 5.7 × 10⁻⁹ | −5.7 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Lithium | 4.9 × 10⁻⁹ | 0 | +4.9 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Nickel | 4.5 × 10⁻⁹ | 0 | +4.5 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Natural graphite | 1.2 × 10⁻⁹ | 0 | +1.2 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Manganese | 4.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ | 0 | +4.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ |
By country where the harm was counted
| Country | Lithium-ion battery pack | Croissant | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Congo, Dem. Rep. | 5.5 × 10⁻⁸ | 6.3 × 10⁻¹² | +5.5 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Ukraine | 6.1 × 10⁻¹⁰ | 2.4 × 10⁻⁸ | −2.4 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Israel | 0 | 1.1 × 10⁻⁸ | −1.1 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Sudan | 0 | 1.0 × 10⁻⁸ | −1.0 × 10⁻⁸ |
| Somalia, Fed. Rep. | 0 | 9.9 × 10⁻⁹ | −9.9 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Philippines | 2.3 × 10⁻⁹ | 1.7 × 10⁻¹² | +2.3 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Pakistan | 2.9 × 10⁻¹¹ | 2.2 × 10⁻⁹ | −2.2 × 10⁻⁹ |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 0 | 1.9 × 10⁻⁹ | −1.9 × 10⁻⁹ |
Middle estimates. The range above belongs to the totals; these rows show where the middle difference comes from.
By the money method
- Lithium-ion battery pack — 2.3 × 10⁻⁶ per €1,000 spent in its industry(1.5–3.6 × 10⁻⁶)MEDIUMS-MAX · run 2259 · methodology v1.0 · data dv-20261007-44r
- Croissant — 3.4 × 10⁻⁶ per €1,000 spent in its industry(2.2–5.2 × 10⁻⁶)MEDIUMS-MAX · run 2259 · methodology v1.0 · data dv-20261007-44r
Shown, not ranked. Measured per euro, most industries are too close to tell apart, and two products from the same industry always get the same figure per euro.
What this figure is not
Production phase only. Harm from using the product — driving the car, charging the phone — is not in this figure.
HumanToll 2026, run 2259, methodology v1.0. https://quiescence.eu/humantoll/compare/battery-pack/croissant/